Saturday, 30 March 2013
Samsung Galaxy S4 Review - Hands On
 |
The Samsung Galaxy S4 is here, but has it been worth the wait. We put it through its paces in our Galaxy S4 Hands On Review.
Samsung have been top of the Android heap for a while now and their latest flagship handset- theSamsung Galaxy S4, aims to continue that dominance. But the smartphone world hasn’t stood still since the release of the Galaxy S3, with for example Sony and HTC both releasing stellar devices in the form of the Sony Xperia Z and the HTC One respectively, so have Samsung done enough to keep their crown?
Samsung Galaxy S4 Review - Hands On
You might feel a tinge of disappointment when you first set your eyes on the Samsung Galaxy S4, as in keeping with Samsung tradition the phone is mostly made of plastic. We’ve always kind of wished Samsung would do more with the design of their phones, particularly with more and more Android handsets embracing metal and glass. They have at least added a brushed metal band, which runs around the edges of the handset. It looks good and gives us hope that with the S5 Samsung might plump for a truly premium build.
As well as mostly sticking with a plastic build, Samsung have also more or less kept with the physical look of the Galaxy S3, so much so in fact that it can be hard to tell the two apart (other than the aforementioned metal band). The Galaxy S3 was far from an icon of style as it is, so we can’t help but feel that this was a mistake. It’s a similar shape, with the same physical home button below the screen. It’s even exactly the same length as the S3 at 136.6mm.
Samsung have at least managed to make it slightly thinner and less wide than its predecessor, which is pretty impressive given that it’s actually got a slightly bigger screen.
Galaxy S4 - Big and beautiful
Speaking of the screen that’s one area that really is very impressive, as it’s a 5 inch Super AMOLED 1080 x 1920 display with 441 pixels per inch. That makes it both one of the biggest and highest resolution smartphone displays out there (though its resolution is still trumped by the 469 ppi HTC One).
With all that visual splendour you’ll want to keep the screen protected, so it’s a good thing that it uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 to give it some defence from scrapes and scratches.
Samsung Galaxy S4 - Powerhouse performance
We expected world beating specs from the Samsung Galaxy S4 and for the most part we weren’t disappointed. Initially we thought we’d be getting an 8 core processor but it turns out that while some markets will be getting that the UK won’t. We’re not too disappointed though as we still get a quad-core processor clocked at 1.9 GHz, while the octa-core version has slower cores clocked at between 1.2 and 1.6 GHz.
That’s backed up by 2 GB of RAM and running Android Jelly Bean 4.2.2, which on paper gives us perhaps the most powerful phone on the planet (other than the ludicrous octa-core version of the same handset).
S4 Eye-tracking and more
The Galaxy S4 certainly has the specs of a winner, but it takes more than just specs to stay ahead of the game and Samsung obviously realised that as they’ve included some innovative new features with the S4.
With the Galaxy S3 Samsung started experimenting with eye-tracking, incorporating a feature called ‘Smart Stay’, which would detect whether you were looking at the screen and ensure it never turned off while you were. That’s back again in the S4 and it’s been joined by a couple of other eye-tracking features. There’s ‘Smart Pause’ which takes the idea one step further and will pause videos as soon as you look away and ‘Smart Scroll’ which will automatically scroll through web pages if you tilt the device slightly while reading one.
Continuing the idea of interacting with your phone without actually touching it, Samsung have also implemented ‘Air Gestures’, which can detect your finger near the phone, so you can swipe to interact with certain things (such as scrolling through photos) without actually touching the screen- though your finger can’t be more than a couple of centimetres away.
It could be argued that these are all gimmicks, but they certainly help the S4 to stand out from the crowd.
S4 Apps
Samsung have also packed a few of their own apps into the Galaxy S4, with the biggest addition being ‘S Health’. You’ll likely have seen things like this before- it’s basically a fitness app which lets you input what you’ve eaten to track your calories along with a step counter and other fitness tools. It’s nothing new as such but it seems pretty comprehensive and well integrated with the handset.
Galaxy S4 - Stunning snaps
We half expected Samsung to stick with an 8 megapixel camera for their latest flagship, since that still seems to be the norm, but we were pleasantly surprised to find that they plumped for a 13 megapixel snapper instead.
As usual they’ve packed in a bunch of modes and options to play with on the camera, from ISO, metering, face detection and anti-shake to burst mode, cinema mode (which shoots a short video and then lets you choose the best single frame to keep as a photo) and more.
All of that along with the bump in megapixels should make for one of the best cameras found on a smartphone.
Galaxy S4 - Battery life, storage and connectivity
The Samsung Galaxy S4 comes with a beefy 2600 mAh battery- which is larger than the ones found in either the HTC One or Sony Xperia Z. Though we haven’t been able to test it out properly yet that’s likely to give it a fair amount of juice, even with all that power under the hood.
The storage capacity is pretty generous, with the handset coming in 16, 32 or 64 GB varieties, along with support for micro SD cards of up to 64 GB. That gives you up to 128 GB storage in total and no phone offers more than that.
With Bluetooth 4.0, GPS, NFC, 3G and even 4G (if bought on EE), the Galaxy S4 is a very well connected handset too and should be pretty well future proofed in that sense.
Early Verdict - Samsung Galaxy S4 Review
We’ll get back to you with a full review once we’ve had time to really sink our teeth into Samsung’s new flagship, but for now we’re pretty impressed. The plastic body is a bit of a disappointment and in some ways we still wish we’d got the octa-core version (even though we’re not convinced it’s even close to necessary). But what we have got is one of the most powerful phones on the market, with one of the best screens, highest megapixel cameras, biggest batteries and most storage, along with quite a few innovative features besides.
Related Articles
Todays News
Related Reviews
Latest Reviews
Sunday, 17 March 2013
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Friday, 15 March 2013
The Twin lives!
Twins are fascinating. They’ve been the subject of myth and mystery and a source of curiosity to many. At some point we’ll solve all those mysteries but for the time being, we’re still looking for interesting twin stories and trust me, we have one for you.
Identical twins living nearly identical lives are not unheard of. They’re often dressed the same way, they have similar habits, and they have many personality traits in common.
We’re here to talk about a particular set of twins born in Ohio. Separated at birth, adopted by different families, unaware about each other’s existence, both families named the boys Jim.
Both Jims grew up learning law-enforcement training; both had abilities in mechanical drawing and carpentry.
Where it gets weird:
They each married women named Linda.
Where it gets even weirder:
They both had sons whom one named James Alan and the other James Allan.
Wait there’s more:
The twins also divorced their wives and remarried, this time each to women named Betty.
Let’s go – Round 4:
They both owned dogs they named Toy.
Jim Lewis and Jim Springer met on February 9, 1979 after 39 years of being separated. Everybody loves a happy ending!
Successful sibling businesses
Walt and Roy Disney
Founded Disney Brothers Cartoon Studio in 1923. In the midst of the Depression, six years later, they reincorporated into Walt Disney Productions, and the rest, as they say, is history.
Stories from the Olympics: A healthy dose of sibling rivalry!
It was an epic moment when the Brownlee brothers met each other at the finishing line of the Triathlon. Only a special few get to win an Olympic medal and have their brother there to share it with them.
Sibling rivalry is often one of the biggest downfalls in sibling relationships. Irrespective of the age difference, in eons or null, everything from money to food to love from our parents must be shared equally. Time and time again, we are reminded that the world isn’t fair, an the harsh reality is that it starts right from home.
But what of the twins competing in the Olympics? Twins make great teams. China’s Jiang Wenwen and Jiang Tingting and Argentina’s Etel and Sofia Sánchez are all competing in synchronized swimming, the former as part of a team and the latter as a duo. Rowers Grant and Ross James competed in the men’s eight for the United States. Both sports require impeccable timing and communication with your team mate, skills which come naturally to twins or close siblings.
However, twins also fight to be seen as individuals. Belgian brothers Jonathan and Kévin Borlée are sprinters. They are part of the men’s 4×400m relay team, but they also raced against each other in the men’s 400m, coming in fifth and sixth respectively, with only 200ths of a second between them. How must it feel to know your brother could snatch glory from your hands?
The Brownlee brothers are not twins, there are two years between them. But they live and train together. With this in mind, I wonder how they felt about competing for the same prize. There was only one gold medal to be won, and as far as I know the medals can’t be split down the middle like a KitKat.
It’s not easy for anyone to accept that their sibling might be better than them. Nevertheless, the race would have been very different if Alistair had hung back for his brother, jogging on the spot while Johnny waited out his 15 seconds in the penalty box. It was, after all, a competition. Johnny even said afterwards, “I saw the board with number 31 on it and thought my brother had got a penalty. I thought ‘What an idiot Alistair, you’ve got a penalty’. Then I looked at my arm and realised I was number 31.” The Brownlee’s may claim to be a team, but let’s not sugar coat the facts. Each brother wanted to win.
Maybe the only thing better than sharing success with a sibling, is not sharing success with a sibling. Sometimes we crave to be recognised in our own right. While we should applaud Johnny’s bronze coloured success, we shouldn’t shy away from celebrating Alistair’s golden glory. Brother or no brother, Alistair was better on the day. In sport, as is often the case in life, it’s not about fairness. It’s about whoever gets to the finishing line first.
Do they look identical to you?
Some identical twins do everything in tandem, from coming down with chickenpox to donning tutus for ballet lessons. But Jo and Kerry Burton have taken this fact to a whole new level. When Jo decided to have cosmetic surgery on her nose, Kerry followed suit. And since that day, the sisters have spent £60,000 on a host of operations – all carried out at the same time by the same doctors – to ensure they cannot be told apart. They even had to have their initials written on their bellies so the surgeon knew who was who. At age 34, they both have had a breast enlargement, eye-lift, permanent make-up tattoos and Botox jabs.
Looking UP to your siblings…
There are many benefits to having older brothers and/or sisters: they provide a reliable source of advice, they keep the bullies off your back and they can help you build up a healthy alcohol and cigarette dependency long before it’s legal to do so. Now it turns out that older siblings give you someone to look up to. Literally.
Science has proven that having older siblings noticeably stunts your growth. A scientific study following 14,000 British children found that those with three siblings were, on average, one inch shorter than their peers, the youngest being the shortest.
Why? They think one factor is that, along with stinky second-hand clothes and a beat up backpack, the youngest has to make do with a stretched-out, hand-me-down uterus. As a mother goes through multiple pregnancies, she tends to put on weight, has worse blood sugar and generally stops giving a crap.
It’s like making three pizzas. The first one gets all the best ingredients, arranged carefully in a perfect ratio across every slice. For the second one, you find that you’ve run out of cheese halfway through, and you kind of just throw everything on there. For the third, you shit on the pizza just to see how it turns out. If you’re the youngest in your family, you are that third pizza.
Then, after you’re born, it turns out that not only do your parents love your older siblings more than you, they also spend more of their household’s available resources on them. There is simply less time, money and attention available to a family’s youngest child.
In big families, parents cannot provide proper nutrition to their youngest children, presumably because after years of responsible child rearing, they decide that owning a feral scavenger might be a fun change of pace.
Why fighting with your sibling is good
The sheer quantity of time spent in one another’s presence between siblings is striking. By the time children are 11, they devote about 33% of their free time to their siblings–more time than they spend with friends, parents, teachers or even by themselves–according to a well-regarded Penn State University study published in 1996. Later research, published last year, found that even adolescents, who have usually begun going their own way, devote at least 10 hours a week to activities with their siblings–a lot when you consider that with school, sports, dates and sleep, there aren’t a whole lot of free hours left.
Laurie Kramer, professor of applied family studies at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, has found that, on average, sibs between 3 and 7 years old engage in some kind of conflict 3.5 times an hour. Kids in the 2-to-4 age group top out at 6.3–or more than one clash every 10 minutes, according to a Canadian study. “Getting along with a sister or brother,” Kramer says dryly, “can be a frustrating experience.”
In essence, you become better at negotiating and you pick up better social skills. Adulthood, after all, is practically defined by peer relationships–the workplace, a marriage, the church building committee. As siblings, we may sulk and fume but by nighttime we still return to the same twin beds in the same shared room. Peace is made when one sib offers a toy or shares a thought or throws a pillow in a mock provocation that releases the lingering tension in a burst of roughhousing. Somewhere in there is the early training for the e-mail joke that breaks an office silence or the husband who signals that a fight is over by asking his wife what she thinks they should do about that fast-approaching vacation anyway. “Sibling relationships are where you learn all this,” says developmental psychologist Susan McHale of Penn State University. “They are relationships between equals.”
Yes, we love research – useful of otherwise!
Wednesday, 13 March 2013
Sahara Force India Formula One Team, the trading name of Force India Formula One Team Limited, is a Formula One racing team based inSilverstone, United Kingdom which currently holds an Indian licence. The team was formed in October 2007 when a consortium led by Indian businessman Vijay Mallya and Michiel Mol bought the Spyker F1 team for € 90 million.[4] Force India F1 represents increased Indian participation within Formula One, with Greater Noida having hosted the first Indian Grand Prix in 2011.[5] The Fédération Internationale de
 | |
| Full name | Sahara Force India Formula One Team (2012–) Force India Formula One Team (2008–2011) |
|---|---|
| Base | Silverstone, Northamptonshire, United Kingdom |
| Team principal(s) | Vijay Mallya |
| COO | Otmar Szafnauer |
| Technical director | Andrew Green |
| Website | www.forceindiaf1.com |
| Previous name | Spyker F1 Team |
| 2013 Formula One season | |
| Race drivers | 14.  Adrian Sutil[1]15.  Paul di Resta[2] |
| Test drivers | James Rossiter[3] |
| Chassis | Force India VJM06 |
| Engine | Mercedes-Benz |
| Tyres | Pirelli |
| Formula One World Championship career | |
| Debut | 2008 Australian Grand Prix |
| Latest race | 2012 Brazilian Grand Prix |
| Races competed | 93 |
| Constructors' Championships | 0 |
| Drivers' Championships | 0 |
| Race victories | 0 |
| Pole positions | 1 |
| Fastest laps | 2 |
| 2012 position | 7th (109 pts) |
l'Automobile confirmed the change in name from Spyker to Force India on 24 October 2007.[6]
After going through 29 races without scoring points, Force India won their first Formula One world championship points and podium place whenGiancarlo Fisichella finished second in the 2009 Belgian Grand Prix,[7] Force India scored points again in the following race when Adrian Sutil finished fourth, and set the team's first fastest lap, at the Italian Grand Prix.
In October 2011, Indian company Sahara India Pariwar, purchased 42.5% of Force India F1's shares at $US 100 million.[
Origins
- Jordan
Main article: Jordan Grand Prix
The team has its origins in the Jordan Grand Prix team, which entered Formula One racing in 1991 based at the Silverstone racing circuit. Jordan enjoyed many years in Formula One, winning four races and achieving third place in the 1999 constructors title. However, like many of the smaller teams in the 2000s, financial problems meant the team's performance dried up, and team owner Eddie Jordan sold the team to the Midland Group in 2005.
- Midland F1 & Spyker
Main articles: Midland F1 Racing and Spyker F1
The renamed Midland F1 Racing team spent two seasons at the back of grid, before owner Alex Shnaider sold the team on to Spyker Cars mid-way through the 2006 season.[9] Spyker F1 scored a point in 2007 and briefly led the European Grand Prix; despite this, the team once again hit financing issues,[10] and was sold on to Indian businessman Vijay Mallya, Chairman of the United Breweries Group and Michiel Mol, Spyker’s Formula One Director.[4]
- Force India
The team, bought for € 88 million,[11] was renamed as Force India Formula One Team for the 2008 season, and retained team principal Colin Kolles, Chief Technology Officer Mike Gascoyneand driver Adrian Sutil.[11]
[edit]Beginnings and Ferrari engines (2008)
After retaining Adrian Sutil for the team's first season, Force India conducted winter tests for the second driver and testing roles. Ex-Renault driverGiancarlo Fisichella was chosen for the race seat, and Vitantonio Liuzzi secured the reserve role;[12] they were to drive an updated version of the Spyker F8-VIIB chassis with Ferrari engines, christened the Force India VJM01.[13] Testing of the car begun in February, after the gold, tungsten and white liveried car was launched at the Gateway of India in Mumbai.[14] With an increased budget and wind tunnels from defence company EADS,[15] the team set itself the target of beating Super Aguri, a squad which spent the previous seasons contesting at the back with Force India's predecessors.[15]
Melbourne was the scene of Force India's first race, and although the Australian Grand Prix gave the team a poor start with both drivers retiring in the first few laps,[16] the following race in Malaysia saw Fisichella's twelfth place earn the team's first finish. After disappointing results in the opening races, Sutil gave the team the chance to score its first points in the wet Monaco Grand Prix, but towards the end of the race Kimi Räikkönen's Ferrari lost control and hit Sutil's car causing immediate retirement.[17] Although a furious Gascoyne called for Raikkonen to be penalised,[18] overtakes under yellow flag conditions would have meant Sutil receiving a time penalty post-race, dropping him out of points.[19] Continuous updates to improve reliability and performance allowed the team to close the gap to the fastest teams during the mid-season, despite Super Aguri's withdrawal meaning the two cars started from the rear of the grid for the majority of races. A seamless-shift transmission introduced at Valencia marked the end of development for the car;[20] team owner Mallya had realised underinvestment and continued changes of ownership had led the team to fall behind.[20] Force India had been focusing on 2009 since Mallya brought the team, believing that the new regulations would yield better results.[21][22] Despite halting work on the VJM01, Fisichella put his car to a season-best 12th on the grid at the Italian Grand Prix during an extremely wet qualifying session; he was however to crash out during the race.[23] Fisichella continued his good form by reaching second during the Singapore round and fifth at the season-ending Brazilian Grand Prix; a safety car before his pit stop prevented points in Singapore, while transmission issues in Brazil left him 18th and two laps down.[24] Force India finished the season tenth place in the Constructors Championship, and Fisichella achieved the best finish of tenth at the Spanish Grand Prix.[24]
[edit]Mercedes engines and success (2009)
Force India retained the same drivers for the 2009 season.[25] At the wet Chinese Grand Prix, Sutil almost secured Force India's first points, holding sixth place in front of Lewis Hamilton and Timo Glock with six laps remaining when aquaplaning led to the Force India car skidding off the road and crashing out of the race. At the German Grand Prix, Sutil qualified in seventh place and battled for the points, reaching second at one point, before colliding with Kimi Räikkönen after exiting the pit lane and being forced to pit again to change a broken front wing. He finished 15th.
Force India gained their first pole position in Formula One when Fisichella qualified fastest at the Belgian Grand Prix in Spa.[26] He finished the race in second position, less than a second behind Kimi Räikkönen earning Force India's first ever points and podium position. Missing the win was partially blamed on the car's lack of KERS, a system present on the Ferrari.
On 3 September 2009, Force India announced that they were releasing Fisichella from his contract to allow him to race for Ferrari for the remainder of the season. It was announced four days later that test driver Vitantonio Liuzzi would replace Fisichella for the remaining races.[27]
In qualifying for the Italian Grand Prix at Monza, Sutil qualified second and Liuzzi, on his race debut for the team, qualified seventh. On race day, Sutil finished fourth and clocked the fastest lap of the race. While running fourth in the race, Liuzzi had to retire due to a transmission failure. Force India finished the season ninth in front of Scuderia Toro Rosso with 13 points, however, this did not reflect the vast improvement Force India had made from the start of the season.
[edit]VJM02
Main article: Force India VJM02
The VJM02 was powered by Mercedes-Benz engines from the 2009 season after signing a five-year deal on 10 November 2008. The deal also included a supply of McLaren-Mercedes gearboxes, hydraulic systems and the KERS feature. The car was revealed on 1 March 2009.[28] The VJM02 was the first Force India car to pick up points, pole position and fastest lap at the 2009 Belgian Grand Prix but the race was won by Ferrari's Kimi Räikkönen.
[edit]2010 season
.jpg)
The team announced on 27 November 2009, that it was to keep Adrian Sutil and Vitantonio Liuzzi for the 2010 season.[29] The team tested Paul di Resta and J. R. Hildebrand at Jerez, with di Resta setting a much faster time.[30] The VJM03 was the team's 2010 Formula One season chassis.[31] Di Resta was confirmed as the team's test driver on 2 February 2010.[32] On 9 February 2010, Force India unveiled their new car, theVJM03, which will be used in the 2010 season.
The 2010 season began with points in Bahrain, with Liuzzi finishing in ninth position. Sutil had qualified in tenth, but was involved in a first-lap incident with the Renault of Robert Kubica. He ultimately recovered to finish in twelfth position. In Australia, Sutil again qualified in the top ten, with Liuzzi qualifying thirteenth. Liuzzi finished the race in seventh, while Sutil retired with an engine problem. In Malaysia Sutil scored ten points with fifth and Liuzzi retired early due to a throttle problem, his first retirement of the season. In the next few races, apart from a retirement from Liuzzi, the Force Indias had quiet races in the midfield, staying mainly out of the action in front of and behind them, with Sutil scoring points in Spain. At Monaco both cars finished the race in eighth and ninth, avoiding the numerous incidents, giving the team their first double points finish. In Turkey, Sutil finished 9th scoring two points, while Liuzzi finished 13th. At the following race in Montreal, both cars finished in the points, with Liuzzi finishing 9th and Sutil in 10th.
A number of senior personnel left the team during the season, with technical director James Key being the highest-profile member, leaving to join Sauber in a similar role. Chief designer Lewis Butler, head of aerodynamics Marianne Hinson, and commercial director Ian Phillips also left the outfit.[33]
[edit]2011 season
On 26 January 2011, the team announced that reserve driver Paul di Resta would be promoted to a race seat for the 2011 season, to partner Adrian Sutil.[34] The team launched their new car, the VJM04 on 8 February 2011 via an online launch. The VJM04 is the first car created under new technical director Andrew Green and developed using the resources from partners McLaren Applied Technologies and Mercedes-Benz HighPerformanceEngines.[35] In the first race of the year in Australia, Sutil and di Resta finished the race in eleventh and twelfth places respectively but were later promoted to ninth and tenth after both Sauber cars were disqualified for a technical infringement relating to the rear wing of both their cars.[36]
Di Resta scored more points in Malaysia but he had to retire in Turkey. Sutil finished seventh in Monaco, and ninth in Valencia. Di Resta was bound for points in Britain before a collision with Buemi, while Sutil finished sixth in Germany ahead of the Mercedes cars. Di Resta finished seventh in Hungary, eighth in Italy and took his best race result of sixth in Singapore, while Sutil added a seventh place finish in Belgium and an eighth in Singapore. Di Resta scored another point in Korea, while at the inaugural Indian Grand Prix, Sutil scored two points with ninth place.[37] At the final race in Brazil, Sutil matched his best finish of the season with sixth place, while di Resta finished eighth, to help the team finish sixth in the Constructors' Championship, four points in arrears of fifth-placed Renault.[38]
[edit]2012 season
.jpg)
For their 2012 line-up, the team retained Paul di Resta and replaced Adrian Sutil with their 2011 reserve driver, Nico Hülkenberg.[39] Jules Bianchi was later named as the team's reserve driver, and will also take part in Friday practice for the team during the season.[40] The team's car, the VJM05, was launched at Silverstone on 3 February.[41]
The Force India crew tried to pull out of the 2012 Bahrain Grand Prix due to a revolution against the regime and the death of a protester.[42] However, after the team's refusal to take to the circuit, there was a confrontation between F1 chief Bernie Ecclestone and the Force India team.[43]
[edit]Sponsorship and partners
Kingfisher, a brand owned by Vijay Mallya, is the primary sponsor. Other sponsors for 2008 included ICICI Bank, Medion, Kanyan Capital, Reebok andReliance Industries Limited.[44] The above sponsors, except ICICI Bank and Kanyan Capital, continue to sponsor the team in 2009. New sponsors include AVG, Airbus and Whyte & Mackay.
In December 2009, Computational Research Laboratories (CRL), a wholly owned subsidiary of Tata Sons, and Force India Formula One Team announced an exclusive three-year multi-million dollar partnership deal to offer a fully automated Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solution to aid the design of the team’s next generation race cars as well improve aerodynamic efficiency in the current racing models.[45] Force India F1 has tied up with Airbus and EADS for technological support, and has a technical partnership withMcLaren.[46]
In October 2011, Indian company Sahara India Pariwar purchased 42.5% of the team's shares for $100 million.[8] Mallya retains 42.5%, and the remaining 15% belongs to the Mol family. The team was renamed Sahara Force India as a result.[47] The shares sold were newly issued; Mallya and Mol did not sell any of their existing shares.[48]
Aethra, a leading Brazilian auto parts manufacturer joined the team as an official partner in 2012.[49] Other sponsors include Kingfisher Airlines, Whyte and Mackay, United Breweries Group,Vladivar Vodka, AVG Technologies, Alpinestars, Reebok, Schroth Racing, Muc-Off, Hackett, Chatham-Marine, UPS Direct, STILL and STL.[50]
[edit]Complete Formula One results
(key) (results in bold indicate pole position; results in italics indicate fastest lap)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)